Islam, A Coherent Social Justice Tradition
By Omar Suleiman | 2026-01-06T19:53:13.748296+00:00 | Topic: Justice
Islam: A Coherent Social Justice Tradition
Shaykh Omar Suleiman 16th MAS-ICNA Convention
Opening
Peace and blessings of Allah be upon you.
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful. All praise is due to Allah, Lord of the Worlds. May the peace and blessings be upon the Messenger of Allah, his family, his companions, and all who follow them.
I forgot my number one rule with conventions. When you check into the hotel, ask for the floor that's closest to the lobby. That's a pro tip for everyone that woke up and came at 10am. When you go to a conference, always ask for the floor at the very top floor. So you stop at every elevator and you got to worry about people that are pressing down over and over again, which segues good into the topic of social justice. Justice to the speakers.
But Alhamdulillah, I want to thank you all for coming on time to this conference. You don't really know what to expect when you're doing the first session of a conference if anybody's going to show up. So I was expecting to talk to five people.
So Alhamdulillah, this is a good opportunity to actually have a fruitful discussion with a group of motivated individuals. I want to thank you on behalf of Yaqeen Institute for being here. I want to thank everyone, all the fellows, all the volunteers, and Ali, who just heard his marriage story.
And our operations manager, Dr. Altaaf Hussain, the vice president, but also my mentor, as well as being the vice president of Yaqeen Institute, and everyone that's been following our work. And Alhamdulillah, some of you may have noted that we just hit our one year birthday. We are only one year old, but Alhamdulillah, we've been able to achieve a lot more than we could have expected by the grace of Allah.
Introduction to the 40 Hadiths on Social Justice
So a quick show of hands, how many of you have followed in some capacity the 40 hadiths on social justice? Not many of you. So this was a class, one of the first classes, actually the first class that I've actually taught on a weekly basis with Yaqeen Institute is the 40 hadiths on social justice. And just to let you all know, we're at hadith 25 now, so you still have time to attend the rest of it inshallah.
It should end the week of Ramadan, so it's every Tuesday night, we have a break right now until mid-January, but we're covering a hadith every week and then extrapolating from that hadith lessons on Islam's unique social justice paradigm. Now the reason why I chose to do this class, and at the end inshallah, it's going to be compiled into a book format, so there will be additional notes, and it will be made accessible in book format. There are already professional notes that are taken every single week, so if you've missed the first 24, then just read the notes if you don't feel like listening to the lecture.
But the idea was based on a foundational principle that we believe that Islam provides unique paradigms to deal with social injustices and inequities. That our religion is not just another religion that will throw in some languaging to already existing paradigms, but actually has unique paradigms and unique solutions to the problems that we face in the arena of social justice.
Islam's Unique Anti-Racism Tradition
And I was mentioning this yesterday at the Knowledge Retreat, that Islam, for example, on racism is the only tradition in which you have an explicit anti-racism tradition. You have explicit references to not discriminating against people on the basis of the color of their skin or their tribe or whatever it may be, and it's extensive. It's not one verse or one tradition of the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم),but it's extensive, whereas other religions, that was deduced from overall concepts of equality and the treatment of the other.
But Islam was very specific on the anti-racism references, which made it attractive to the Edward Blyden's of the world, and even had strands of Islam in Garveyite teachings, and then obviously found its way into the nation of Islam and many of the movements that became prominent here in the United States that were in the initial phase part of the rebirth of people like Malcolm X and Muhammad Ali.
So we have unique paradigms and we have unique languaging and we have unique constructs, and we should take pride in that. When Malcolm came back from Hajj, he said that I believe Islam has the solution to the problem of racism in America. He didn't say that I found a religion that transformed me, that removed racism from me, but he saw that Islam actually provided a solution to the problem of racism in America.
Malcolm was a brilliant man. He's an intelligent man. He's not saying, you know, he's not using any form of exaggeration or speaking about Islam in idealistic terms. He's saying that I believe Islam has solutions to the problem of racism in America and other problems that come out of that problem of racism.
And that's why when he left the nation of Islam, he formed Muslim Mosque and he formed the Organization of Afro-American Unity because he wanted people to see what he saw in Islam as a wholesome, comprehensive solution. But in the meantime, he saw that it was important to work with all people of all faiths, whatever their background was, to deal with the problem and to offer Islam as a solution rather than the solution.
To let Islam be part of the dialogue on how we solve these problems in society rather than dominating the conversation and disrespecting others that come with their solutions. Let Islam shine. Let Islam shine by showing itself as a practical, comprehensive, wholesome solution to this problem.
Unique Islamic Paradigms in Social Justice
So what are the unique paradigms that we find in Islam and social justice? Because one thing I don't want us to do is I don't want us to simply add to the mix that's already out there and not offer anything unique as a Muslim community and in the realm of scholarship.
The Role of the Hereafter
Well for one, in Islam, the concept of justice applies not just to the body but to the soul. And it applies not just to this dunya but to the akhira as well. It extends beyond this life and it goes into the afterlife. The presence of the hereafter is core to our understanding of justice. Why? Because the first rule on the Day of Judgment is:
There is no injustice today.
That does not force the one who is being wrong to acquiesce but it allows for the one who is being wrong to have something to look forward to even if justice is not served in this world. So the presence of the akhira, the presence of the hereafter is a unique factor in how we discuss justice as a whole.
That this world is not meant to be a place of fairness. That doesn't mean we don't strive for it. That doesn't mean that we fall into the disease of using religion to temper calls for justice or to quiet those calls.
But what it does mean is that we always have hope in Allah and we do believe that there is an eventual rectification of all of the wrongs that are done in this world.
Timeless Principles
Also in Islam we do believe in timeless principles. That the language of jurisprudence often changes. That sometimes necessities make things that are ordinarily prohibited permitted in certain circumstances. But at the end of the day that the prophets came with timeless principles. That at the core the message of Isa (عليه السلام) the message of Jesus peace be upon him was at its core the same message as the message of Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم) and the same message of Musa (عليه السلام) and whatever it may be.
There is a distinction. Many scholars have spoken about the attempt to pit Malcolm and Martin against each other in regards to their ideologies. To present Martin Luther King Jr. as the sanitized controlled civil rights activists that we could tolerate and Malcolm as the radical that we have to excommunicate.
And putting them on these opposing ends. Whereas if you look at Martin Luther King Jr. in his last few years you find a man that had adopted many of Malcolm's notions and there is the book Malcolm and Martin Dreams and Nightmares by James Cone which does away with that fallacy. Let's take that to a more traditional construct.
The idea that Musa (عليه السلام) was this vengeful man who was so radically devoted to justice that he was blinded from any sense of mercy. So Musa (عليه السلام) Moses was about an eye for an eye. But Jesus, Isa (عليه السلام) was so radically dedicated to mercy and compassion that he ignored notions of justice.
So Musa (عليه السلام) is portrayed as angry. Isa (عليه السلام) is portrayed as ever loving and ever caring. But Isa (عليه السلام) got into trouble because of his dedication to justice as much as his dedication to theology.
He was challenging the political establishment. He was flipping tables in the temple. You could read the remnants of his speeches, whatever amongst it is authentic or not. When he spoke in Jerusalem, when he spoke in Al-Quds, he challenged everybody. And he was very aggressive in his challenging.
But there are notions that have been fed to us that always conveniently put people in the places of heroes and villains in accordance with how much we feel like we can appropriate so that we can perpetuate systems of injustice either theologically or politically.
So that was done with the prophets of Allah and it's done with our figures even in the 20th century today. So the prophets have timeless principles and we believe that we can extract those principles from the prophets of Allah (عليهم السلام) and from the messengers of the prophets that came before him.
Redefining Social Justice Terms
So the question becomes, does Islam really have any unique paradigms in regards to social justice? Is it even valid? Is it even a valid discussion to use social justice? And I'm going to say this also that a lot of people have a problem with the term social justice because social justice might denote a certain ideology, right? And my response to that is that the prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) took things that were good at their face value, terms, models, slogans, but he rectified the internal mechanics and the mechanisms to be derived from that to where they were sound.
Example: Helping Your Brother
So for example, when the prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) said:
(Sahih al-Bukhari 2444) Help your brother whether he's oppressed or whether he's an oppressor.
The Arabs knew that sentence and that sentence was actually a very problematic sentence and an anti-Islamic sentence. Because what that meant before Islam, (انْصُرْ أَخَاكَ ظَالِمًا أَوْ مَظْلُومًا) Support your brother whether he's oppressed or whether he's an oppressor, was that whether he is wrong or right, he's your brother, you've got to have his back and you have to take his side in any dispute.
So they said to the prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم),we understand how we can support our brother when he's oppressed, but we don't understand how you're saying to support him when he's an oppressor. We thought that Islam rid us of these radical attachments and this partisanship that blinds us from justice.
And the prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) said:
Support your brother when he's oppressed and support your brother when he's an oppressor by stopping him from oppressing.
So he changed the meaning of it while still maintaining its face value. So even if these terms could denote certain ideologies and constructs and paradigms, that doesn't mean that the terms are useless because justice that is demanded from within, from a society that has self-restoring mechanisms for injustices, that are independent of changes at head of state or whatever it may be, those are valid Islamic notions and there are things that we can draw from in our deen.
Economic Justice in Islam
So does Islam have unique paradigms? One of the topics that's gonna be covered by sister Noor Subhani inshallah is a paper, "Does Islam Need Saving?" which analyzes human rights from an Islamic perspective versus a secular perspective. And it's based on the UN Charter of Human Rights. I'm gonna be talking about here just briefly another UN document that's less known.
But the UN also authored a document on social justice in the year 2004. So it was actually titled "Social Justice in an Open World, The Role of the United Nations."
And from the introduction, it was very clear that what was most dominant in the discussion of social justice was economic injustice. Now, is there any deen, any religion in the world as strict on economic transaction as the religion of Islam? No. And Islam rooted all of its prohibitions and permissions in economic transaction in the concept of justice.
So when usury, riba is discussed and its prohibition, it's because of the injustice, the inherent injustice of riba, of gharar, which is an overuse of speculation used to exploit people, which is usually in insurance contracts and things of that sort. So the strictness of Islam on the soundness of an economic transaction is always rooted in a sense of justice.
(Sahih Muslim 101) Whoever deceives is not from amongst us.
That if you're selling a product, you don't put the rotten part in a way that it's hidden and only put the useful looking part of the grain. That you should always disclose what the flaws of your product are, so that you're not wronging the person that you're selling to.
That you don't make false oaths when you're buying and selling. Most of Islam's discussion on adl, in our day to day, on justice in our day to day, also deals with economics.
[The lecture continues with extensive discussion on economic inequality, redistribution of wealth, and the Islamic balance between personal incentive and social justice]
The Quranic Principle of Human Equality
So
The most noble of you in the sight of Allah is the one who is most pious.
And every single person has access to means of acquiring justice and attaining justice in Islam.
Examples from Islamic History
The Society of the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم)
Whether it's the head, whether it's the ruler himself, or the lowest of low, even a prisoner of war, even someone that was hostile to the state has certain rights that cannot be denied by anybody else. So Islam doesn't believe in income equality, but it does believe in human equality in that sense.
So the society of the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) and this is what I'm trying to get at, could allow for Abdurrahman ibn Auf, while doing away with the greed that could plague Abdurrahman ibn Auf.
Abdurrahman ibn Auf, the man who was so rich and so wealthy that when he came back to Medina with his caravans, people would think that they were being placed under siege. Islam had that, where that could happen, where a man like that could get that rich. But Islam also has many mechanisms to make sure that Abdurrahman ibn Auf, a person like Abdurrahman ibn Auf, is both spiritually humbled and controlled in the sense that he cannot exploit or allow his greed to make him unjust, that he has to earn that in a halal way.
There's the spiritual checks, which are Abdurrahman ibn Auf making tawaf in every one of his tawafs, asking Allah to protect him from shuh, to protect him from greed. Hearing the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) saying that Abdurrahman ibn Auf was crawling into Jannah in a humble way, even though he's from the ten promised paradise, but it's not that easy for you. Just because you have prosperity in this world doesn't mean you have prosperity in the hereafter.
Abu Huraira: Dignity in Poverty
So it allows for, and this is what I'm trying to get at from a social justice perspective, Islam at a societal level could produce Abdurrahman ibn Auf without the greed, and it could also produce Abu Huraira without the humiliation. Abu Huraira (رضي الله تعالى عنه) was a homeless man.
He was very poor, he was very hungry. But the society that the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) created was one in which a person in the circumstances of Abu Huraira was not humiliated, he was dignified in every way. So he didn't have to lose his dignity in the process of his poverty.
Ahl as-Suffah: The Homeless in the Masjid
What did the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) do? Where did he put the homeless? In the masjid, Ahl as-Suffah. They lived in the masjid and everyone had a responsibility to them. No, you don't get to make
them disappear, you have to deal with their conditions. So it was not this rosy, idealistic notion of income equality, but you are responsible for those people and they're treated with dignity and we're not going to make them disappear.
We're going to try to make their conditions disappear. So guess what? Abu Huraira (رضي الله تعالى عنه) he made it. And eventually all those people from Ahl as-Suffah, they made it.
Ali and the Shield: Equal Justice
The story of Ali (رضي الله تعالى عنه) and his shield. Ali (رضي الله تعالى عنه) while he's the khalifa, his shield was missing. So he lost his shield, and then he found it with a Christian man under his rule.
There was a Christian man walking around with his shield. He said, that's my shield. He said, no, it's not. He's like, whatever, I'm the khalifa of a Muslim state. I hate to even use the Islamic state now, because when you read literature from 2004, 2005, and they say the Islamic state, none of them were talking about Daesh by the way, but what they meant was that Islamic state. The real Islamic, put the Islamic back into the Islamic state.
So Ali (رضي الله تعالى عنه) saw this man with his shield. He said, that's my shield. The guy said, no, it's not. I mean, this guy is not Muslim. He's dealing with the most powerful man in the state. Ali (رضي الله تعالی عنه) says, I'm going to report you to the judge.
So he goes to Shurayh al-qadi, a judge who's not a companion. So their status also in regards to the spiritual status that's been given, or the elevation that's been given to the sahaba, the nobility of the companion. Shurayh is not a companion.
Ali (رضي الله تعالى عنه) is of the greatest companions. Of the greatest companions. And he's from the (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم) family of the Prophet
I mean, the distinctions are all there. And Shurayh says, okay, what's your evidence that it's your shield? He said, I've got my son, and I've got my servant, and they could both testify that that's my shield. He says, as for your son, he's biased because he's your son.
I can't take his testimony. He said, he's al-hassan. Ali (رضي الله تعالى عنه) argued. He said, Allahu akbar. He said, you're not going to take the testimony of a man that the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) شهدَ لَهُ بِالْجَنَّةِ . The Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) called him a master of the people of Jannah.
You're not going to take his testimony? He said, he's your son. I can't take his testimony. He said, as for your servant, well, maybe he's just doing it out of fear.
Maybe he'll testify out of being forced. So Ali (رضي الله تعالى عنه) just says he argued his case, then he gave up, and he was walking away. And the Christian man is like, what just happened here? This is incredible.
And subhanAllah, he did take shahada, and he handed him back the shield, and told him when he stole the shield, that during the battle of Siffin, he was able to take it from Ali (رضي الله عنه)'s possessions. He said, this is the akhlaq, these are the morals of the Prophets. He was a Christian man.
He said, this represents what Christianity was supposed to be. It's being practiced. The message, the values of Christ are being practiced here. And so he took shahada, and Ali (رضي الله عنه) gifted him the shield. He gave it back to him and told him, it's yours, as a gift. The point being is that everyone, the ruler and the ruled, are accountable to a higher power.
Stability and Choosing the Lesser Evil
And this is something that's found constantly in our Islamic discourse. Okay, what are some of the other things? Well, the role of stability. Choosing the lesser of the two evils.
That is present in our deen. We don't just invoke chaos for the sake of chaos. Stability is a factor. So, choosing the lesser of the two evils. That doesn't mean you give up the cause of justice, but you don't harm the cause of justice by causing more chaos in prematurely seeking it out, or doing so in an ill-equipped or ill-mannered fashion.
The evil is not changed with another evil
The cause of justice does not become supreme to all circumstances, even though it is never neglected. Religion is not a tool of the state, but religion is a tool to check the state.
Contemporary Applications
Zakah as Social Institution
And also, and I'll end with this inshallah, then we'll go to the question and answer part. When we look at, particularly when it comes to economic injustices, the purpose of implementing certain things in our faith, certain practices in our faith, was not just for the sake of having them done, but also for the sake of ultimately realizing a time when those institutions are no longer necessary.
So for example, zakah is one of the five pillars of Islam. Zakah is one of the five pillars, and lo and behold, out of greed, the first pillar that there was an attempt to abolish was zakah, out of the five pillars. That just shows you at the end of the day that we're attached to our money. The first pillar of Islam that there was an attempt to abolish was zakah.
Allah mentions a violent attachment to wealth
So every penny, every dirham, we will scrap for it, and we will try to make sure that we're able to claim as much as we possibly can. So zakah is a part of our faith.
It's the first attempt was to abolish zakah from our faith. And zakah does not go to a foreign entity with no impact on the average man. If you look at many other religions, at the institutional level, the income deductions from a person, from the faithful follower go to the state, or go to the church, or go to this institution.
In the case of zakah, the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) said, take from their rich and give to their poor. So don't even take it out of the city. If you can. When he sent Mu'adh (رضي الله تعالى عنه) to Yemen.
It's also an institution that ideally doesn't have to exist if wholesome justice is sought. This is an interesting concept here. It's one of the pillars of our deen. But in the time of Umar ibn Abdulaziz rahimahullah, he couldn't find anyone to accept zakah anymore in Africa, in the entire continent of Africa, or what part of it was Muslim and under his rule, because of the amount of justice that he brought to the system itself.
Because poverty usually is a man-made disaster. It's a result of injustice. So because of all the checks that Umar (رضي الله تعالى عنه) put into the system, his zakah collector came back from Africa and said, I can't find anyone to give zakah to.
The Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) mentioned the time of Isa (عليه السلام) the return of Jesus peace be upon him, that in the return of Isa (عليه السلام) Isa (عليه السلام) would find no one left to give zakah to. Because the goal still remains to end poverty. The goal still remains to end poverty to where that's not even a necessary mechanism.
Conclusion
So the point being here is that Islam does obviously offer unique paradigms and constructs. Some of them make assumptions that there is the presence of a state, which has been the case throughout our history until recent history.
That's why you have in fiqh, ahkam as-sultaniyya, the rulings that are determined at the state level. But at the same time we can develop our paradigms in a way, or we can develop on these paradigms that have been given to us in a way that we can start to really deal with the social ills that we have in our own society.
And that's the attempt inshallah that we're making in this class, the 40 hadith on social justice. So make dua for its success. I hope that there was something of benefit in what I shared today. May Allah accept if there was. And may Allah forgive me for any shortcomings. Allahumma ameen.
Q&A Session
[The document continues with an extensive Q&A session covering topics including:]
- Contradictions between Islam and other ideologies (Marxism, liberalism)
- Wealth redistribution in Islamic societies
- Sexual assault and institutional responses in Muslim communities
- Privacy rights in Islamic law
- Implementation of social justice in non-Muslim countries
- The role of masajid in addressing homelessness
- Due process and victim protection
[The session concludes with announcements about Yaqeen Institute's first journal and upcoming sessions.]