Is Islam To Blame for ISIS - Northhaven Methodist Church

By Omar Suleiman | 2026-01-06T20:43:19.948087+00:00 | Topic: Iman

Document

Is Islam To Blame for ISIS? - Sh. Omar Suleiman | Northhaven Methodist Church

Introduction

The theme for Second Community this year has been "Owning our violence and affirming non-violence." We have had some very powerful conversations about violence and non-violence from religious faith leaders of many traditions and tonight we are very very pleased to have Imam Omar Suleiman. His title for the evening is "Is Islam to blame for ISIS?" I think we probably know the answer to that question before we start but anyway, the answer is no.

I am so pleased to know Imam Suleiman and to call him a friend for the last several years. I believe we first met at a vigil for gun violence against gun violence down at the Martin Luther King Center. We have bumped into each other at various marches. He is really becoming quite one of the most influential faith voices in Dallas, Texas, in my opinion frankly in the nation and shows up for stuff - he shows up and speaks up and on various causes.

Imam Suleiman is the president of the Yaqeen Institute for Islamic research, the resident scholar for the Valley Ranch Islamic Center and one of the tri-chairs for the faith forward Dallas at Thanksgiving Square Group. There is a Muslim, Christian and Jewish chair. I'm honored to be a part of that and to serve under him and our other two co-chairs. That's a good group, wonderful lovely interfaith group. So without any further ado, would you welcome our friend Imam Omar Suleiman?

Opening Remarks

Good evening everyone. It is an honor to be here and to see this type of crowd. I honestly wasn't expecting this type of crowd, so many people to come out at an event like this. It's a testimony to the leadership of this church. It's a testimony to the history of this church. It's testimony to the goodness that exists in each and every single one of you to come listen to me speak tonight.

I wanted to say a few things - Eric is a wonderful friend and he's a wonderful faith leader in Dallas as well. I'm certainly undeserving of many of the things that he said. I stand in solidarity with him tonight and not wearing a tie. I told him that I usually wear a tie but as I was getting dressed for the event, I was like, I don't think I've ever seen Eric wear a tie. So I said I'm not gonna outdo him at his church, you know. So I decided to dress only up to what Eric would wear but all right.

It's a pleasure to be here and I would like to seek your forgiveness from the very beginning because I'm going to speak with some bluntness. Obviously we live in very troubling times. We live in times where the rhetoric has become more and more destructive and I actually plan on opening my heart today as a

Muslim and my guess would be that the Muslims that you see scattered in the crowd would be nodding their heads when I echo some of the sentiments that we feel as a Muslim community.

The Question of Condemnation

I used to not get offended by the question: Do you condemn terrorism? Do you condemn ISIS? Do you condemn al-Qaeda? That question used to be a simple question and the answer used to always be no and it continues to be no but somewhere along the line I started to get offended by that question because I started to realize that the place from where that question comes sometimes is a very bigoted place.

That for you to even have to ask me - a New Orleans boy born and raised in New Orleans, I'm an immigrant from Louisiana here in Texas - for you to ask me that question means that in many ways you may have ingested many of the stereotypes that are present in the media today that are very ugly and that continue to push a narrative that is simply untrue.

And in many ways we found ourselves even in the political discourse in this battle between the good Muslim and the bad Muslim. And I remember meeting a faith leader and as a faith leader introduced me to his wife, he said "don't worry, he's one of the good ones" and I laughed about it, but then I went home and I thought to myself, you know, that was pretty inappropriate. He's one of the good ones because there is this growing idea of the good Muslim versus the bad Muslim.

And in many ways Muslims are being portrayed on either side of the aisle as either political instruments in the war on terror - so we can't be racist or bigoted against Muslims because we need them in the war on terror - or they're all terrorists. So we find ourselves in this political football game where we're always the football and we don't actually have a chance to be represented in an authentic fashion in a way that truly talks about us beyond being informants or terrorists, beyond being effective allies in the war on terror or the enemies in the war on terror.

Who Are Muslim Americans?

Who is this group of people particularly Muslim Americans and do they have anything to do with the threats of quote-unquote Islamic terrorism or radical Islam? Are they themselves responsible in any way or is their religion responsible for the deviated forms and perverted forms of their faith, which do not resemble their faith in any way whatsoever?

So for one thing:

We have Muslim women in every sphere of politics, obviously with the fallout after - or not the fallout, well, it was sort of a fallout - the Khizr Khan gold star family. You have over 3,000 Muslims that have served in the armed forces and in many situations once again, you have Muslims that are your average neighbors. Muslims that like the same foods that you do. If you have a Muslim that was born in Texas and raised in Texas, they're probably Cowboys fans. I am NOT a Cowboys fan because I'm from New Orleans. So I'm a Saints fan dedicated - even when we stink I stick to my team, but it's the average person.

The Nature of Bigotry

Now bigotry and the reason why I introduce it or I start off with this - bigotry is often built on extremely crude oversimplifications of people. Stereotypical simplifications of people.

I was on my way from the Muhammad Ali funeral and I had the blessing of attending that. Not just one of the greatest Muslim Americans if not the greatest Muslim American in history, one of the greatest Americans in history. And as I saw ESPN and the news cycles portraying Muhammad Ali, I thought to myself maybe this is a moment where we wake up and we see that they're not all the same, that there are wonderful Muslim contributors that are as American as anyone else. And then of course the shooting in Orlando happened less than 48 hours after that and suddenly the narrative shifted once again.

So when it comes to bigotry, it often has very crude oversimplifications of people and I want to start off by eliminating that narrative before we discuss anything about ISIS or we discuss anything about terrorism or radicalism. It is unjust to a people to stereotype them by the worst of them - those that would not even fit in with them, those who would not be claimed even by the overwhelming majority of them. In the situation of ISIS, those who are usually the victims of ISIS being portrayed.

And it was ironic - there was a woman in New York who I know who was walking in Times Square and someone set her hijab on fire and ran off. And that was a woman whose cousin was killed by ISIS in Iraq. And I thought to myself, you know the irony of the situation - getting killed in Iraq for not being ISIS, for being Muslim because ISIS doesn't like Muslims, they tend to kill Muslims. And here a person can yell a derogatory remark at someone, a racist remark, a very bigoted remark and set him on fire. And in many situations a person can be killed with the uptick that we see in hatred, hate crimes towards Muslims as a whole.

The Good Muslim vs Bad Muslim Narrative

Now in this oversimplification as well and from the tactics of bigotry is that a Muslim is a good Muslim if they don't really believe in all the tenets of their faith. So when you hear politicians now speak about Islam and they speak about Muslims - yes, Muslims can be good Americans if they don't believe in XYZ, as long as they reject this, as long as they basically reject the Quran, then they can be good Muslims.

And when an authentic Muslim comes forth and says well, my religion doesn't represent that. So I am a dedicated and devout Muslim and because of that I reject violence, because of that I reject terrorism, because of that I reject extremism, because of that I embrace coexistence, because of that I embrace equality and so on so forth - the answer would be you're lying. You don't know your faith like I know your faith. Why? Because I heard some guy on TV who's never studied your religion, who's probably never even studied period but happens to have a microphone and happens to have the airwaves and they told me this about your faith.

And so we've fallen into this twisted realm where you can't trust a Muslim because he's either a peaceful liar or he's an honest criminal. So if he tells you or she tells you that that's not what my faith represents and I do believe in values of peace and justice that I believe are deeply grounded in my faith, then you don't know your religion properly or you're hiding your religion - mistrust. Don't trust the Muslim next door. Behind that smile is really, you know, death to America and Allahu Akbar. They're gonna try to kill you and it's only a matter of time. Don't eat their food, right? Because if you eat their food, you know what's going to come next, you know what's going to happen, you never know.

And so the portrayal is always that the Muslim that you think is just your average citizen, your neighbor, your friend really could turn out to belong to a terrorist group 8,000 miles away. And this entire niceness, this front of niceness and all you know the millions of Muslim Americans have all settled themselves and they're all part of this worldwide conspiracy to overthrow the American government and we need to pass bills now to stop that because less than 1% of the population is going to successfully overthrow the government if we don't hurry up and pass bills and criminalize their religion now.

Think about the bigoted assumption that that comes from and the fears that are stoked and the paranoia. And usually what leads to - what the manifestation of fear from a policy perspective is the abandonment of freedom often willingly by the citizens who are told that we have to protect you. And so we need to do away with your civil liberties and the civil liberties of everybody because if we don't, those nice Muslims around you, those 10% of Muslim American doctors, the two Muslim congressmen, right, the Muslim president - he's not really Muslim, I hope you guys actually know that but - the Muslim in the White House, they're all gonna come after you. They're all gonna kill you and so we've got, you know, it's for that reason that we have to wage wars, destructive wars, that we have to invade countries, that we have to do this all for your protection.

And that's venturing into politics and I'm not going to get into that right now. Simply the premise that I'd like to start off with and I think that was a 15-minute introduction is that bigotry comes from a place of oversimplification and it often leads to policy that is not in the favor of anyone in this country and often leads to the willful submission or forfeiting of your own civil liberties and your own rights.

Studies on Prejudice

And I'll share with you all a few studies. This one's from the 2010 Gallup report "Religious Perceptions in America" with an in-depth analysis of U.S. attitudes towards Muslims and Islam. And this is very interesting because it reads: the variable most strongly linked to self-reported prejudice towards Muslims is self-reported prejudice towards Jews. Respondents who say they feel a great deal of prejudice or extreme prejudice towards Jews are about 32 times as likely to report feeling a great deal of prejudice towards Muslims.

So bigotry comes from a familiar place and what we often see - which by the way in the last four years, the membership of the Ku Klux Klan has gone from 5,000 to 8,000 - that many of the groups that promote Islamophobia also promote anti-semitism, also promote white supremacy, also promote very very ugly things about Black people in this country, about Mexicans and Latinos and so on so forth. In fact Pamela Geller, a prominent Islamophobe who held the event in Garland, you know last year, she has actually written an article arguing that Barack Obama is Malcolm X's love child. She actually believes that and there are people that would actually believe that. So bigotry often comes from a familiar place and we have to call it out as we see it now.

There are a few things that also come as a result of this:

  1. It's dangerous and according to the FBI, the only group in 2015 which had an uptick in hate crimes against it is the Muslim community. We're the only faith community according to the latest study that was reported in the Washington Post that's more unpopular than atheists.
  2. Brookings poll showed that 61% of Americans hold an unfavorable view of Islam and 46% hold an unfavorable view of Muslims.
  3. Now here's the other thing that study showed - that roughly one half of Americans, 50% of Americans say they don't know any Muslims.

So what does that tell you? Fear also comes from a place of ignorance and at times it's as simple as asking that Muslim that you see - can you tell me about your religion? And trust me, we love that. It is so amazing, you know, amongst all the go-back homes and the middle fingers and the people yelling things at Muslims when they're coming out of a grocery store or at a restaurant with a rude waiter, when someone comes up to a Muslim or goes up to a Muslim and says hey, I want to ask you a question about your faith - right now don't do that to a Sikh because unfortunately Sikhs have been on the receiving end

Extracted Text

of many of the hate crimes that are directed towards the Muslim community because people think they look like Muslims, right, which shows you again how base the ignorance of our community truly is.

So with that 60 plus percent of people that hold an unfavorable view of Islam, 48% that hold an unfavorable view of Muslims, but 50% have never known a Muslim, it shows you that the cure to this disease first and foremost starts from a place of knowledge and I congratulate each and every single one of you for coming out today to actually get to know a Muslim and hear a Muslim out.

Media Portrayal

Another study showed that over 25 years, The New York Times has portrayed Islam and Muslims more negatively than cancer, cocaine and alcohol. So we're in good company.

Last night after the presidential debate - if you want to call it a debate - last night after the spectacle that we saw on TV that I would not allow my children to watch, after one of the presidential candidates suggested that the problem, the reason why we have Islamophobia is because Muslims don't report stuff that they should be reporting. Well, the solution clearly is not to get more Muslim spies because the Orlando shooter was reported. Omar Mateen was reported by the Muslim community before, not to mention all the other nuances that came out from that story that surfaced from that story after the public had already judged what his motivations were and what that was all about.

Ahmed Rahimi in New Jersey who thankfully was not able to kill anybody but planted bombs in New Jersey and New York trying to hurt people - his father says he called the FBI and told the FBI that my son is off and you need to come and get him and you need to deal with him. So clearly that's not the solution because many times these future terrorists are people that go on to become terrorists are actually reported.

In fact a Duke University study, which is called "Anti-terror Lessons of Muslim American Community" states, and I quote: Muslim American communities have been active in preventing radicalization. The people that would go on to kill in the name of Islam tended to not attend any mosque whatsoever, were completely alienated from their mosque leadership, had no association whatsoever with their local mosque and in many many cases were not even practicing Muslims.

The Profile of Extremists

Okay, I'll read to you a quote from The Guardian which said that far from being religious zealots, a large number of those involved in terrorism do not practice their faith regularly. Many lack religious literacy and could actually be regarded as religious outliers. Very few have been brought up in strongly religious households and there is a higher than average proportion of converts. Some are involved in drug-taking, drinking alcohol, visiting prostitutes. The MI5 says there's evidence that a well-established religious

identity actually protects against violent radicalization - meaning there's a significant connection between a person going to their mosque and being attached to their leadership in this country.

There's a significant connection not between that and radicalization, but rather the opposite. That Muslims that have a well-established identity and that are going to a place of worship, that are going to their mosques, that associate with their congregation, that are not involved in drugs or prostitution or those types of things are often - are most of the time not the ones that would be prone to radicalization. Rather, radicalization takes place on the internet usually after many other factors that go into it.

Statistical Reality

So the question is: is fear of Islam and Muslims rational? According to Gallup, half of Americans are scared of being victims of terror. Now according to Gallup as well, you're more likely statistically to be shot by a toddler than by an Islamic terrorist. So the solution first and foremost is to make sure you know that we deport all toddlers and we don't let any of them in this country anymore because clearly they pose a legitimate statistical threat. You're also more likely to be killed by your furniture than by a Muslim in this country. That's not to completely downplay the threat but that's to say that you need to watch your couch, you need to watch your bed because you don't know what it's planning to do against you.

Now there are a few studies on a serious note. There is a study of a thousand Americans in the weeks after 9/11 that showed that the average person believed that they had a 20% chance of being injured in a terrorist related incident in the next year but they would not have faced that even if there was a 9/11 every day for that year. This is from David Cole who wrote "Less Safe, Less Free."

Between 1980 and 2005, only 6% of terror attacks in the U.S. were by Muslims. 2010 Europol report showed that from 2007 to 2009, 99.6% of all terror attacks in the European Union were done by non- Muslims. So when you think of "we don't want to become Europe" - all right, which I understand you know for other reasons as a whole, right? That's the pro-American anti-Europe part of me coming out, but on a serious note, you know statistically speaking, the idea that Muslims pose a more significant threat to society than anyone else is completely baseless.

That's not to downplay the threat of radicalism. It's not to downplay the threat of terrorism. However, are we looking at all forms of terrorism equally? Are we looking at all mass shootings equally? There were over 300 mass shootings in the year 2015. Two of them were done by Muslims. Are we analyzing the facts properly or are we analyzing them through the prism that is given to us by our favorite cable news network?

And that is the problem with us - that many times we choose to focus on not what's actually happening around us but what the news tells us is happening around us and those things that are overblown. And what is pumped into us and driven by agenda politics is what we are going to shape our lives after, shape our identities after and proportion our fears and normal daily lives after by what is fed to us by the media.

As of June 2005, two times as many Americans had been killed by right-wing extremist groups as by Muslims - 48 by right-wing extremist groups, 26 by Muslims. That's a study from the New America Foundation. And again as I mentioned the 300 mass shootings, but what about the other ones? These are the ones that are actually labeled as terror attacks. These are attacks that are labeled as terror attacks. Many times other things are not labeled as terror attacks.

The Double Standard in Labeling

So one of the issues that we have in regards to our polemics and in regards to our labeling is that if it's done by a Muslim, it's a terrorist attack. If it's not done by a Muslim, it's not a terrorist attack. We have shifted effectively the definition to just that, right? So before we know the nuances of a case, before we know anything about a person's personal life - such as the attack in France, a man who was a non- practicing Muslim who identified loosely, who really was born to Muslim parents, used to drink, go to clubs, had nothing to do with his local mosque. And the first person he ran over with his truck was a Muslim, a Muslim grandmother in fact was the first person that he plowed through. One-fifth of his victims in France were Muslims but immediately was dubbed an Islamic terrorist attack very quickly before any of the facts come out about that case.

Now in the case of other attacks, if it is not a Muslim, no matter what ideological motivations are found, that will not be dubbed a terrorist attack. And that has frequently been the case over and over again.

I can give you some examples:

• Anders Breivik who perpetrated the Norway attacks on the 22nd of July 2011. He first killed eight people by detonating a van bomb in Oslo, and then he shot dead 69 participants of a Workers Youth League summer camp. He cites in his manifesto Thomas Jefferson ten times. He cites Robert Spencer who was a prominent Islamophobe 47 times in his manifesto. It was not dubbed a terrorist attack.

• Michael Page walked into a Sikh temple, murdered six people in New York. It was not dubbed a terrorist attack.

• Dylann Roof in Charleston murdered nine African-American worshippers in a church as they worshipped. Clearly had ideological motivations, manifesto from his Facebook page and so on so forth. It was never called a terrorist attack.

• Robert Dear who attacked a Planned Parenthood Clinic and killed two people, called himself a warrior of Christ. This was the day before San Bernardino. It was not called a terrorist attack.

• Robert Doggart, a Tennessee pastor who planned a massacre of Muslims in New York. His manifestos claimed that Christ called him to kill Muslim men, women and children. He had a stockpile of rifles, machetes, bomb-making materials. He was let out. In fact, he walks free today because he did not succeed in perpetrating that attack.

So when we talk about motivations and we talk about people killing in the name of their religion, in the name of their faith and what constitutes a terror attack, there has been a great discrepancy and a great double standard in how we assign those terms. And not only does that frustrate the Muslim community, it portrays a very inaccurate picture of our society as it exists today where we focus and we hijack the fears that are manufactured by our politicians to move this country to a place that we have been before which we don't want to go back to - where people have the right to not only discriminate without being held accountable, not only make bigoted and racist remarks and profile without being held accountable, but we move to a discourse where we can openly speak about internment camps and we can speak about racial profiling.

And that has devastating consequences not just on our generation, but on the generation that's coming up. We had a Muslim child of 11 years old hang himself, commit suicide last week because he was being bullied in school.

The Impact of Collective Guilt

So this the devastating impacts of this inaccurate, inappropriate assignment of collective guilt to an entire community over the actions of an extremist group or extremist groups is dangerous to our society. It endangers our community and endangers everything that we're trying to do and in many cases can be done away with by gatherings such as this and by simply getting to know your neighbor, getting to know your Muslim neighbors.

And one of the risks and one of the problems with the response to that which has come from a place of bigotry is that when you look at individuals that are prone to radicalism, they tend to come from a place of mental disturbance. They tend to come from broken homes. They tend to come from career frustrations, school frustrations. Very gloomy worldviews and when you pour pessimism into that worldview and continue to invoke a clash of civilizations and continue to feast on a person who's having a problem fitting in, who does not know what their cultural identity is, then you only further stigmatize them. And when you further stigmatize a person who is already aspirational, then you risk making that person operational, which is why much of the election discourse that we've had this year has found itself not only in ISIS propaganda videos but in al-Shabaab propaganda videos in Somalia, they found itself in Boko Haram propaganda videos.

Our election cycle has been used to create more terrorists, to generate more terrorists, to tell more young Muslims that America hates you, that it's only a matter of time, that you cannot be a good American and a good Muslim, that you have to choose one of those - you can't love both. And if you listen to what radicals say and if you listen to what Islamophobes say, they're saying essentially the exact same thing: You can't be a good American Muslim. Think about that. On one side, you can't be a real American if you're a real Muslim because you will never be a loyal citizen. And on the other side you have the exact same message that's being said.

Understanding the Roots of Extremism

So when we talk about combating ISIS and we talk about combating radicalization, what exactly does that mean and where do these play, where do these extremist groups come from? I want to refer to you for your reading "Dying to Win," a book called "Dying to Win" by Robert Pape where Robert Pape examined more than 2,200 suicide attacks across the world from 1980 to the present and his research revealed that more than 90% of suicide attacks are directed at an occupying force or what's deemed an occupying force. He also analyzed that between 1980 and 2003, only 10% of suicide attacks were against American interests. Before that, the single largest group were the Tamil Tigers who are not a Muslim group.

According to Gallup, 93% of Muslims worldwide are moderates. Of the 7% who have radical sympathies, 6.7% give political reasons for their radicalization rather than religious reasons. Suicide attacks, terrorism all come from a place of political frustration at an organized level. That has historically been the case and it's not just true for Muslims. It's true for the entire world.

Now surely in a church you can appreciate this - that the claim that more people have been killed because of religion in history than anything else is also statistically untrue. For those of you that don't know, the 20th century was the deadliest century in our human history. Over a quarter billion people were killed, were murdered in the 20th century. Professor Rudolf Rummel notes that 62 million were killed under the Soviet regime, 35 million were murdered under Mao's Communist Party of China. And he writes: the much greater slaughter of the 20th century occurred because of two ahistorical socio-political experiments - one fascism, especially in Germany, Italy, Eastern Europe, Japan and China, and the other communism. These absolutist, unrestricted, uninhibited ideologies murdered people in war and democide without compunction, without the inhibition of tradition, culture or religion.

So it was radical atheism the problem in the 20th century? Because it wasn't religion. It wasn't radical Islam. It wasn't radical Christianity. It was actually competing ideologies that both deemed religion to be the opium of the masses and both deemed religion to be harmful, to be negative, to be the reason and the cause for much of the backwardness that we had in the world at the time.

And so when we talk about today, systematic violence by man almost always involves the use of ideology to clothe that which is otherwise unjustifiable with that which is holy. It's the way that we work as human beings. It's part of our savagery when we tend to that direction and may God protect our country and protect us from ever falling to such a disease at a collective level. And if we're going to quantify our savagery as men over history, Islam has very little to do with most of the violence through pure statistical analysis. But when conflict breaks out, people rally around their identities as we see happening here. We are a very divided nation and that's very clear in our political discourse.

The Danger of Division

One of the most heartbreaking things is that no matter what happens in this election, we have two competing visions of American society often talking at each other and not talking to each other. People entrench themselves in very very strong identities that often mean that they cannot coexist with people that belong to other identities.

Now is the solution to that to further entrench someone who is being called to an identity that puts him or her at odds with this society? Or is it better for us to say in the face of Islamophobia, to say in the face of extremism and terrorists whether they're overseas or they are domestic, that we will not be divided? That you can be a good American, a good Muslim, that you have a right to speak up, to speak your mind, to be frustrated and that we will not allow your identity to be hijacked by someone that is overseas and that wishes you and I harm.

So when we talk about militant groups, we're often talking about fraternities, and I want to end with this sentiment. There are legitimate frustrations in the world. There are legitimate frustrations that young people have about our politics, about our policy - not just as the United States of America, but in Egypt or in Iraq or in the United Kingdom. We often have very serious concerns about policy because at the end of the day we know that politics are dominated largely by economic interests that are usually corrupt.

And so when young people have frustrations about the world and about policy and we oversimplify their frustrations or worse, we don't give them a healthy outlet to voice their frustrations and show them that we have a society that listens and that hears - as JFK said, those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable.

And so we have to also look internally at our situation. Since World War Two, 90% of the casualties of war have been unarmed civilians, a third of them have been children. So when we talk about drone strikes or we talk about invasions of countries or we talk about emboldening dictators or we talk about supporting apartheid regimes or we talk about doing things for our interests that are often to the detriment of other people's interests, you're going to have frustrations.

And just like when you hear extremists and radicals overseas say that it is okay to kill thousands of innocent people for the sake of our political agenda, for the sake of our political benefit, when we respond and we say that we will carpet bomb entire countries and when we respond and we try to oversimplify the situation of Iraq, which has been bombed by four consecutive presidents, and think that ISIS came out of a healthy functioning geopolitical situation, we're not being true to ourselves and we are not giving an accurate analysis of the situation.

So it's important for us to listen, to actually be honest with ourselves, to actually try to make our country better always, to make our policy better, to accommodate opposing voices, to not turn people towards radicalism or extremism by our extreme hesitance to listen to what other people are saying.

The Cycle of Violence

You know, I remember - because I actually listen to or I read ISIS propaganda quite a bit, not because I'm joining, I can assure you that I'm not planning on joining ISIS anytime soon, but because I'm trying to understand their messaging so that I can counter it properly. And so yes, by the way, they want to kill me. I don't think I mentioned that but I'm actually one of the people they want to kill.

But when we talk about that and I keep on, I kept on reading this statement: "Just like they kill our children, we will kill their children. Just like they kill our children, we will kill their children." Listen to that sentence and think about how that appeals to a person who may have lost their own family to a drone strike or to an airstrike, a young child that washed up ashore somewhere whose family was lost at sea. We saw those images of that young boy sitting in the back of an ambulance wondering what happened.

So when we talk about the lives that have been lost in the war on terror - this is according to a report from Physicians for Social Responsibility in 2015 - that in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan, you have over 1.3 million people, innocent lives that were killed in the process of the war on terror.

So if all else were the same, here is my conclusion: if all else were the same from a geopolitical situation and Islam never was, would ISIS exist? The answer is yes. Would al-Qaeda exist? The answer is yes. When there is a vacuum of power, when there are frustrations, when there are civil wars, when there's sectarian conflict, that in those vacuums militant groups rise, mercenary groups rise and they clothe and they disguise their ugly intentions and agendas that are otherwise unjustifiable often with the Word of God.

So whether we're talking about secular ideology - nationalism sometimes, communism, fascism, sometimes capitalism - if we're talking about religion, whether we're talking about ISIS or the Lord's Resistance Army, or we're talking about the Serbian genocide, or we're talking about Buddhist monks in Burma, or we're talking about whatever it may be - Boko Haram in Nigeria - whatever it may be, it is absolutely essential for us not to respond to that hatred with hatred and think that this is a war in which it's about killing and killing and killing and the way that we're going to stop this is kill more of them. All right?

The response to children being killed is not we need to kill more children. It's that we need to stop the killing of children. It's that we need to have a consistent voice against the killing of innocent people and we need to look to the root causes of wars and divisions, terrorist groups, extremist groups. And we need to hit at those extremist causes and we need to not allow illegitimate groups to manipulate legitimate emotions. We need to not allow groups or agendas that manipulate vulnerable people and that take advantage of vulnerable people and in their desperation turn them to a path of no return that is detrimental to them, to their families and to everybody around us.

Moving Forward Together

And that's something that I hope we maintain across the board here in our American society. If we love this country deeply, then it's not just about whether or not your candidate wins. It's about what our future is and what type of country we're leaving behind for our future generation. That's why I'm pleased to call Eric a friend and a partner and so many faith leaders that are coming together as well to say we want to make Dallas a model city of coexistence. We want Dallas to be a city that people can look at and can say overcame its societal ills. Yes.

We're up against many pessimists who would call themselves realists. We're up against quite a bit when we talk about the cycle because what often happens is that America is inherently in a culture war. It's always been in a culture war. My master's degree is in political history, military history and political history. We always have an enemy and as a country we always identify ourselves by looking at our enemy. So we have to be at war with someone and when we're at war with someone, that's how we craft our national identity. It has always been that case in American history. When we're at war with somebody, that's where we find ourselves. So we base our identity by our enemy who we're fighting right now.

It's the Islamic radical threat on the outside, right? Before it was the Jews, before it was the Catholics, the communists. We had McCarthyism. We had Japanese internment camps where Japanese Americans, over a hundred twenty thousand American citizens were put in internment camps because we can't trust you all. Look, you're up to something, right? And we cannot allow our country to go back to that face.

Bigotry - we have to confront openly our ills of racism, of poverty, of militarism and that's what makes us great Americans. That's what makes us good people. You know I often tell people: don't on your way to becoming a good Muslim don't become a bad human being. And I say that to my Christian brethren as well. That you're a Christian and you're a human being. Being a good Christian should mean being a good human being. Being a good Muslim should mean being a good person. So if our religion leads us to be marginalizing, antagonizing, hateful human beings, then you're certainly not following Christ, peace be upon him, and I'm not following Muhammad, peace be upon him. That's not what we were taught. That's not what we're here for.

Closing

So I pray that this lecture is part of that, this gathering that we have today is part of the solution, part of getting to know one another. I apologize in advance if I offended anyone that came out tonight or if I took too long or if I've made you miss your dinner or if I reminded you of that awful excuse for a debate that we had last night. You know, you got a little sick to your stomach. But you know, bless you all and thank you for being here and I guess we'll move on to questions now. Thank you, Eric, and thank you to the church.